|
| ||||||||||||
|
Jean-Francois St-Amour
|
7/19/98 |
|
Hi, I was reading critics about your #49 tip (about 911 calls vs CPR) and decided to back you up on this one. Placing the 911 call is the most important step in an emergency situation, after making sure the scene is safe for the victims and MOST IMPORTANTLY for yourself. Administering CPR is useless if proper emergency personnel is not called upon the scene. CPR will NOT reanimate anyone (less than 2% actually), proper medical attention will. If you were to do CPR for fifteen minutes before calling 911, your victims chance of survival would be minimal at best. Blood is NOT properly oxygenated during CPR, it is only better than no oxygenation at all. About the particular example given in on critic (R.Goukler), it is an exceptionnal case, but should not be considered to be proper procedure, and I'm scared that some CPR instructor actually used it as an example. Also, M. Goukler missed a vital point in the book, and it is that the 911 actually is way BEFORE the primary survey. However, I did find a few points in your article that needed to be clarified. You didn't mention these facts in your article, and I judged them to be of importance. First, in the case of a multiple victims accident, you must call 911 before you start CPR on any victim, even a small child. Second, you should not even perform CPR on a victim, child or not, if multiple victims are present (more victims than people with first aid knowledge). This is known as triage. And last, all bleeding should be stopped BEFORE CPR is performed! I am aware of ABC, and breathing comes before circulation, but if you perform CPR on a victim with severe bleeding, you will only be pumping his blood out! Anyays, thanks for all your helpfull articles!
Jean-François St-Amour | |
|
Daniel I. Applebaum
|
12/10/97 |
|
Regarding tip #49, I was told in Red Cross CPR class that you cannot
cancel a 911 request for aid. This may vary by region. Once they're
rolling, they will go to the accident scene. I think the assumption
is that if it ever looks like an emergency, the incompetent amateur on
the other end can't later decide that it no longer is an emergency. Also, I disagree, with your "1 minute vs. 10 minutes" argument. Lack of even normal air for 1 minute early on is extraordinally critical. The first few minutes of oxygen deprivation are very important. The minute it took you to stop and secure your bike, coupled with the 30 seconds to assess the situation for safety of yourself and others has already cut into half the time it takes for brain damage to start. That's assuming you started the actions immediately on witnessing a coronary arrest. Add another minute for calling 911 brings you to two and a half minutes. At three minutes, brain damage starts. Also, I'm not sure that coronary cessation is the definition of "dead." Anyway, I have been enjoying your articles. Keep up the good the work, and please accept my comments in the spirit of discussion. Dan.
| |
|
Richard S. Goukler
|
07/30/97 |
|
I have been reading your articles and have found them very helpful and
informative. I am writing to you today after having read your First
Things First article. In the article you propose that placing a 911
call
in an emergency should take precedent over performing life saving
techniques such as CPR and rescue breathing. I disagree with that and have
information from the American Red Cross CPR manual which also contradicts
your statements. According to the ARC there are four steps to perform
when facing an emergency situation. Breifly these are:
4) conduct a secondary survey: gathering additional information about other possible injuries, checking vital signs etc. Safe riding to you! Rick
| |
|
|